I shot mostly black and white using Kodak T400CN so I could get it processed locally and not worry about x-ray damage at the airport. The trip was extended both times to make the travel worthwhile. I was the only "outsider" there, being from England. Edited Decemby Ko.Fe.īack in 1997 and again in 2000 I took part in workshops/retreats organised by the New Hampshire Society of Photographic Artists on a small group of islands called the Isles of Shoals off the coast of New Hampshire. I also think what for consistency in colors the same film is mostly important. But content on this pictures is taking over technicalities and seeing all of these prints at once doesn't really put me off despite different look lenses gives. It varies greatly from next to dull and very soft in the corners to nice and sharp in the middle and just OK for entire print. I knew which lenses he used over years, I knew how they rendered, I sometimes knew which prints were made with which lens and I have seen those prints for real. One of the best 28mm on M Leica example is Winogrand's work over decades. If OP is after "look" and wants it consistent, I say, the Biogon.īut I also think that specific look is irrelevant in good photography shown by OP. Personally, I can't say if one is better than another. I was not impressed with Biogon's distortions and corners performance, but pictures have less clinical look than Elmarit ASPH rendering. I didn't went for charts and tests, but looked at many real users pictures taken with Biogon 28 2.8 ZM and 28mm Elmarit ASPH. I was just looking at 28mm lenses to have something more "serious"ĭu willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! and faster instead or in addition to my Orion-17 28mm f6 (Zeiss Topogon schema), but still keep it in small size. Hallo Gast!ĭu willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. So my two questions are "is the Elmarit ASPH quality worth more than double the price of a used Zeiss 25mm or 28mm?" and "In order to keep my work consistent, should I just stick with the Zeiss 28mm f/2.8 for the way it renders colors?" Examples of my work in Cuba with the 28mm f/2.8 on the Contax G2 below. I really love the results that I got out of my Zeiss and am wondering if I should go with another Zeiss (25mm f/2.8 or 28mm f/2.8) OR a new-ish 28mm Elmarit ASPH. While in Cuba earlier this year, I found myself using the Zeiss 28mm f/2.8 on my Contax G2 quite a bit but for my next few trips, I'll bring only a couple of M bodies (M7 & Typ 246). I'm selling my 21mm Super Angulon f/4 M mount in favor of something a little more "practical".
0 kommentar(er)
